UPDATE 3: In some fairly shoddy webkeeping, the Suffolk News Herald has moved the original editorial. The new web url is now: http://www.suffolknewsherald.com/articles/2008/08/06/news/opinion-comment/our_opinion/opin879.txt
UPDATE 2: I just received an email… and I have a typo as well. My second “your” should have been “you’re”. Spell check worked. Grammar check didn’t. Also, it is the Suffolk News HERALD not Journal. I must have been thinking urinal or something.
UPDATE: Just grabbed my copy of the FREE North Suffolk Edition of the paper. The spelling error is in the print copy as well. What’s that saying about “glass houses”? “too wekes ago eye cudn’t evin speel jernalist, now eye r won!”
Well it would appear that the Suffolk News Journal may be afraid of bloggers. Are they worried about their circulation? Their validity as a media outlet? They should be.
The following editorial in today’s edition of this free newspaper (North Suffolk Edition) has this to say about bloggers:
The bloggers claim they should be included on the list because they are part of the area’s media.
That claim is simply nonsense.
Is it now? Well it would seem while you were writing up this little editorial, that “bloggers” were covering the Republican’s Revival (#dontgo) in Washington DC. Using the NEW media (as opposed to old, recycled paper media), the word was broadcast, live, as it was happening. Text, video and audio. By members of Congress and others. Try that with your paper.
The new media had this covered and broke the story on Friday, August 1st, while you were putting your tabloids in free boxes around town.
The new media has given interviews to much bigger old media outlets than the bird cage liner you call a newspaper. While your paper was covering Little League Baseball, the new media was covering events that will affect how much it costs you to put your newspaper out there. Oil. Energy. Economy. (Please feel free to check on the impact of the new media at http://dontgomovement.com)
Members of the new media are credentialed as “press” at both the Republican and Democratic Conventions this fall. Yet it’s nonsense? Seems folks with bigger irons in the fire than the Suffolk News Journal and the City of Suffolk are paying attention to the new media.
For a newspaper that has to GIVE copies away to get circulation numbers up in the fastest growing part of town you would think you would be a little more supportive of potential subscribers and even develop a working relationship with them.
Anyone with a computer can be a blogger. The ability to type doesn’t make one a legitmate (sic) journalist.
And based on that statement the same could be said for newspaper journalists. Please use spell check. You spelled legitimate incorrectly.
Suffolk News Herald – Suffolk’s Information and News Source
Screen shot of misspelling in editorial before they correct it:
